Monday, November 26, 2012

Online Class for 11/27/2012

Hello everyone!  Hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving break. 
Ten tricky two-toed turkeys trotted on the table.
Greedy gobblers grabbed the gravy.

If you have not already turned in your Journal 2 from Chapter 2, please make sure you do so today.

For our online class tonight please read Chapter 3 and complete the 2 following tasks and post underneath this post where it says "comments." 

EQ: How do people understand and produce language?  What is phonoglogy and what are the phonemes of English?

Key Vocabulary to understand: 

1. Phonology
2. Phonemes
3. Phonetics
4. Language Production
5. Phonotactics


Assignement: 2 tasks

 1. Pick 2 questions to answer from the Applications section on pg. 71 & pg. 72.  OR Answer the Essential Questions from above. 
Try to keep your responses 200 - 400 words. 

2. Respond to a colleague's post in 100-200 words. Can be agreements, disagreements, other thoughts, suggestions, or teaching applications.



Friday, November 16, 2012

Chapter 2 Guided Notes

Our Essential Questions to answer from Chapter 2
¨What is the difference between learning a language and acquiring a language?
¨Is written language acquired naturally or learned consciously?
¨Can people acquire a second language?
Guided Notes:
Summary: There are two views of how people develop literacy. The first, the idea that a language is learned, focused on traditional methods of teaching. The second view,  that of language acquisition, centers around the belief that language is acquired and focused around activities that foster the development of meaning. The following chart summarizes to two views:
Two views of Foreign Language Development:

















Traditional Learning View

Current Acquisition View

Goal:

 

to teach students how to speak and understand the language

Goal:

 

help students use language for different purposes

Method:

 

break language up into parts-

-          pronunciation

-          grammar

-          vocabulary

 

Method:

 

use various techniques while providing students will multiple examples of language input

-          reading a menu

-          reading a newspaper

 

Classroom activities:

 

Students do drills to practice language

Classroom activities:

 

teacher uses gestures, pictures, and real objects to help students acquire language

-          Teacher reads a book to class and students use language to summarize the book

 

Attitude toward errors:

 

Teachers correct to help students develop correct language skills

Attitude toward errors:

 

accepts errors as natural and focuses on helping students gain meaning and express ideas

-          help students learn to express themselves even if they do not know the exact word to use

-          Example: teacher could help student use circumlocution to talk around a word they have not yet acquired using words they already know.

 

Two Views of Reading (p. 24 – 29) 

1) word recognition view – written language must be learned

main task of reading = identify words, connect text to oral word bank. ex: sound out letters, words, recognize

goal:

“recoding” from written to oral language (not decoding, which is finding meaning) 

method:

phonics rules and sight words (flash cards)

breaking words down into parts (prefix, root, suffix)  - structural analysis 

practice:

preteaching of vocabulary words by providing definitions

regular reading aloud and helping students with difficult words or supplying difficult words 

2) Sociopsycholinguistic View – innate ability that is acquired

main task of reading = use background knowledge and cues from three linguistic systems to understand
          

goal:

focus more on making meaning, not identifying individual words

graphophonics (letters and sounds)                        syntax (role in sentence)              semantics (meaning)

1) sample the text (read)

2) predict what will come next

3) make inferences, confirm or disconfirm predictions, integrate new information

*readers will construct different meanings based on their background knowledge and purpose for reading 

method:

combine letters and sounds (graphopohonics) with other sources of information: background knowledge, syntax, semantics

practice:

read extensively to acquire vocabulary in a variety of contexts (see the word several times to understand word forms, role in sentence, formal or informal, AND meaning)

silent reading, individually using reading strategies (like?)

ex: read comprehensible and interesting texts (picture books) so that students gradually learn to make connections b/w oral reading and print  à built up knowledge that allows independent reading

Two Views of Writing (p.29 – 32) 

traditional classroom: break writing into parts, teach each part, cohesiveness and structure important,

                begins with the parts à whole

goal

learn how to produce a good piece of writing 

method

begin with parts and build up to writing a whole text

clearly defined structure of writing

practice

directly instruct formation of letters, words, sentences, paragraphs (essays)

correct each piece of writing

given topic, complete response in limited time (writing test)

 

process classroom: more time on process of writing, content more important to organization and conventions (although those will eventually catch up) ex: invention –> convention

                begins with the message 

goal

produce good writing and acquire knowledge of writing process 

method

begin with the message -- > skills to produce message 

practice

create conditions for authentic written response – many different writing contexts (letters, lists, stories)

writing on a regular basis, and regular reading as input needed for written output

mini-lessons on expression

natural move from invention to convention (ideas to organization and mechanics)

classmates and teachers respond to drafts

Critical Period

Vocabulary

Comprehensible input- students should be able to understand the essence of what is being said and presented to them.

Fossilization- the presence of certain kinds of errors that persist in the speech of adult second language learners.

Lateralization- Language being centered in the left side of the brain in older people and both ways with younger kids

Important Facts

-          Children are better language learners than adults

-           There is a critical period during which language can be acquired.  Once past the developmental period people are not able to acquire a Second language

Examples 

-Adults have more language to learn when acquiring a second language.  When adults go to countries and they have to work  and usually get a chance to speak their native language.

-As a result children receive more comprehensible input in that second language than adults do.
-The three most common explanations as to why most, adults speak a second language with a foreign accent are based on neurological factors, cognitive factors and affective factors.

-  Neurological factors- Intellectual, logical and analytic functions on the left hemisphere.   The right hemisphere is the social and emotional needs.  Lateralization begins at age 2.
-Children who acquire the language before puberty do not have an accent.
-Critical period for the acquisition of phonology is the period prior to changes in the brain associated with laterization.

Cognitive Factors
-Older learners use cognitive processes to analyze language as a result, they have more difficulty acquiring a language  , particularly nuances of pronunciation.

Affective Factors
-Adults are more self-conscious than children and may feel in competent when learning a new language therefore developing an accent.

            -examples
            - nervousness
            -ego
            -having a negative attitude of people who speak that language.

Chapter 2 – Written and Second Language Acquisition

Pg 35 -40 

The Monitor Hypothesis:

·         Helps explain the role of learning in the process of language acquisition

·         Rules of language can be used to monitor spoken or written output

·         Most people monitor their speech in formal situations like speeches

·         However, in the flow of rapid conversation, they don’t have time to monitor the pronunciation and grammar mistakes

·         The more a speaker thinks about the message, the less the speaker can concentrate on the language and vice versa

·         Spoken language is more difficult to monitor than written language

·         More focus on form may interrupt the flow of their ideas

The Input and Output Hypothesis:

·         A teacher should make the input comprehensible

·         Student acquire language when they receive input that is slightly beyond their current level

·         The input should not be either below or at their current level . It should not be too much beyond their level

·         Different students will acquire different parts of language depending on their current level

·         Teachers can use pictures, gestures, tone of voice and hands- on activities to make the input more comprehensible

·         Students need more opportunities to produce comprehensible output as well

·         Good acquirers use different strategies both to understand a second language and also to make themselves understood

                The Affective Filter Hypothesis

·         Affective factors such as nervousness, boredom, and anxiety influence language by serving as a kind of filter to block out incoming messages and prevent language acquisition.

·         Student cannot acquire language that never reaches the language acquisition device

·         Language is acquired in a natural setting where meaningful and relevant comprehension takes place

Schumann’s Theory of Second Language Acquisition

·         Social factors help to explain the rate of acquisition

·         Psychological factors can create psychological distance which when combined with social distance helps explain a slow rate of acquisition

·         Social distance limits opportunities for students to receive the comprehensible input needed for acquisition

·         Psychological distance serves to raise the affective filter and prevent input from reaching the language acquisition device

 

 

Friday, November 2, 2012

Close to our Culture Class 2012

Thank YOU!!!! I wanted to highlight some of your thoughtful comments in your reflections and Case Studies. I feel so lucky to be working with so many CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE EDUCATORS like you.  Here are some things you had to say:


Chances are, if we are looking only at what a student seems to lack, the pattern will continue to be one of negativity.  If we first start with a student’s gifts, we will be that much closer to the sharing of those gifts, and I think we all want that.
Understand their difficulties to develop socially with others and also help them to develop confident in their owns telling them the same thing I tell myself every morning: even though they think I don’t know anything just because I don’t speak their language, I will be showing them they are wrong even in Spanish.
It is important that when we communicate with parents that we are sensitive to their feelings and personal history.
I will make activities based on my immigrant students’ cultures where we talk about their culture so that they feel comfortable in my classroom. I will make them work in groups where they can share their thoughts with other cultural students. I will give my immigrant students more opportunities to bring their ideas and experiences to my classroom. I will make them share their heritage and culture to the whole class.  I will recognize their individuality by showing interest in their learning and provide assistance for their academic success.
They migrated to our country to get a fair or better chance of life.  That does not mean that they have to conform to our ways and accept our beliefs.
It is important that ELL students have access to educational programs that focus on helping students finish school, acquire work skills, postpone parenthood, and keep physically and mentally healthy.  This can enable students to overcome barriers in the classroom.
To engage ELL students in school, educators must not try to impose American’s culture, but instead provide avenues to explore and strengthen their ethnic identities and languages while developing their ability to study and work in this country.
The question then is; how will teachers treat students with characteristics that are different from theirs?  Teachers have the opportunity to judge each student either positively or negatively.
As a teacher, I will make my classroom environment more comfortable for ELL students by posting pictures of different cultures on the classroom walls. I will provide an English speaking buddy (mentor) for each ELL student and make sure that they get help from their buddies. Occasionally, I will make activities based on my immigrant students’ cultures where we talk about their culture so that they feel comfortable in my classroom. I will make them work in groups where they can share their thoughts with other cultural students. I will give my immigrant students more opportunities to bring their ideas and experiences to my classroom. I will make them share their heritage and culture to the whole class. 
The progress of identity determines not only how students feel about themselves, but also what they see as important in their lives.  The challenge that I may have as a teacher is to recognize that these difficulties may be indicative of a need for ESL support rather than of a real learning disability or behavioral disorder. interest in their learning and provide assistance for their academic success.
I am also personally moved by my students’ testimonies of fear and confusion after their movement to the U.S.  Evidence of this constant state of fear surfaced a few weeks ago in two of my classes.  First, in my Extended Learning Time class, students chose a vocabulary word with which to complete a Frayer diagram.  One student chose the word “apprehensive.”  His example sentence read, “I feel apprehensive when I travel because I could get in trouble.”  The accompanying illustration showed a car stopped in front of another car with a red light on the roof, presumably a police car.
Students should be encouraged to remain who they are while respecting, actively engaging in, and appreciating American culture and the opportunities this nation provides to immigrants. The following equation from the chapter summarizes my thoughts effectively: A + B + C = AD + BD + CD, meaning that immigrants should maintain their cultural identities while also acknowledging the dominant American culture on a daily basis.
It is therefore a huge mistake and a disfavor to students when attempt is being made to put them in a “one box fits all” structure.  Those students that cannot fit could be placed in a very disadvantageous situation.  With all the tools that are available today, it is incumbent to give time for students to get acclimatized to their new environment and test them when a deficient learning pattern persists before placing blames or labels as to why “Johnny could not succeed”    
Coming from a background that could have easily made me a culturally insensitive and racist individual didn’t happen.  Whether it was my own sense of right and wrong or just luck I was able to retain my own cultural identity and appreciate the things that make it great and still have the capacity to recognize weaknesses and issues that need to be addressed.  What I hope is the next cycle I go through is the clarified identity to achieve societal change (Noel 2008).  
I have learned to see beyond what my student just did and begin to ask what must have been the motivation or reason behind his/her action.  I now understand that constructive and earnest dialoguing with my student is needed in order to help student and teacher expand their identity.  My perspective as a teacher should be informed by my specific communities so that acquiring a new perspective from another culture should serve to deepen my understanding as an educator in my quest to help my student understand in a positive way their cultural and ethnic identity.  
In class a few days ago, the school’s lunch menu was announced on the morning announcements, and one of the menu items was called “Asian To-Go”. One of my students looked at me and remarked, “isn’t that a little racist”. 
Focusing on schoolwork becomes secondary when your parents are taken from you and your future seems uncertain.
The instructor Elizabeth Webb reminded me that to really understand a different culture, and to empathize with that culture, requires looking within first, and understanding one’s own culture as a basis for understanding others.
I know that students as well as teachers have far more varied life-affecting circumstances and environments in their lives than just race and nationality can define.  If we limit our understanding of people to just those basic labels, we not only lose the opportunity to make universal threads of connection in other, and sometimes far more important ways, we also fail to see people as more than just those basic attempts to define them. 
Rather than using a heavy-handed discipline or instructional approach, I try to inspire students to develop empathy and understanding for my classroom goals as well as those of each other, to lend a helping hand when they can, and to encourage others to stay on a positive track with their work. 
For English Language Learners, their home language is a large part of their personal identities.  Language connects us to others, and if you are not living in a place where your home language is not the language of power or the majority language, it can feel as if part of your very identity is being denied. Therefore, teachers should make every effort to affirm students’ identities – both the aspects that are carried over from a former home and the emerging qualities that result from living in a new, different culture.
I am genuinely interested in learning about my students’ culture, not just to help them, but because I genuinely want to know them better since I feel like my students are a big part of my life since I see them day in and day out.
It is difficult to strike a balance between preparing students for success according to specific, state and federally mandated measures of success (standardized tests) and allowing students to express other ways of knowing.
This chapter’s information helps me to see that even though students have cultural differences, that they still can be successful in their own unique way.  One just has to go beyond their our own confusion and fears as well as be willing to understand the many approaches to identity construction.
Many people at some time in their lives have a revelation to search to understand their cultural, ethnic, or sexual identity.  This is seen as an “encounter” or an “Ah-hah!” moment that sometimes may startle or confuse us. But, we must learn to accept our identity and move forward even though our reaction may range from cognitive dissonance to emotional shock.